Monthly Archives: October 2009

Hume despre miracole (de fapt nu e vorba despre ce spune el, ci despre ce-as spune eu, daca as fi Hume)

Spre sfarsitul capitolului 10 din Cercetare asupra intelectului omenesc mr. H vorbeste despre scenariul invierii unei regine. Dupa care spune (sursa e aici)

But should this miracle be ascribed to any new system of religion; men, in all ages, have been so much imposed on by ridiculous stories of that kind, that this very circumstance would be a full proof of a cheat, and sufficient, with all men of sense, not only to make them reject the fact, but even reject it without farther examination. Though the Being to whom the miracle is ascribed, be, in this case, Almighty, it does not, upon that account, become a whit more probable; since it is impossible for us to know the attributes or actions of such a Being, otherwise than from the experience which we have of his productions, in the usual course of nature.

Continue reading Hume despre miracole (de fapt nu e vorba despre ce spune el, ci despre ce-as spune eu, daca as fi Hume)

De citit

As vrea sa citesc:

  • Ce spun Habermas si Apel despre pragmatica universala (sau pragmatica transcendentala)
  • Horkheimer, Zum Begriff der Vernunft si eventual si Gadamer (Vernunft in Zeitater der Wissenschaft)
  • Ce spune Toulmin despre ratiunea colectiva (si in genere, ce spune el despre rationalitate)
  • Searle and Vanderveken, Foundations of Illocutionary Logic (1985)
  • J. Bennett, Rationality: an essay towards an analysis

Ce mai fac in rest se poate vedea pe @filosofie, @filtech si @scirelig.