These are some notes which I wrote down in the last few months. I was thinking of writing a book, so I wrote in order to make the topic of my book a bit more clear. This is the only use of this text – to make it clear for myself what I am supposed to write about in my book. The only result of writing everything found here, which I would acknowledge, is that the title of my book should be ‘Reason, Language and Actions’. Nothing else should be taken seriously, nothing is worth mentioning etc. I did not proofread the text for grammar mistakes. If you want to take a look at it, you’re on your own.
There is nothing which I would claim to be true (or even acceptable) here, so I should not be quoted on any of the following lines. I wrote them down just to reflect on some topics (personal identity, responsibility, obligations, existence of God, theology of atonement, actions, intentions, reasoning, having a concept etc.) in my spare time. I am not posting these thoughts here because they could be of any use to someone else. It is just that I do not see why I should refrain from posting them here for my own use.
Las aici însemnările pe care le-am făcut în vara asta la mare, fiindcă aşa mi-ar fi mai la îndemână să le revăd mai târziu. Nu consider că au vreo valoare intelectuală.
Just some scribbles, nothing here is publishable.
Ne-am putea astepta ca la aceasta intrebare sa primim un raspuns din partea oamenilor de stiinta. Astfel de raspunsuri exista. Sa ne intrebam, totusi, pe ce se sprijina ele.
M-am jucat un pic cu Gephi:
Sagetile exprima relatia “intelegerea conceptului A presupune drept conditie necesara intelegerea conceptului B”. N-am fost consecvent in ce priveste tranzitivitatea relatiei respective (inca nu mi-e clar de ce).